Skip to content

General FAQ

Start here for chain positioning, network status, assets, and basic guarantees. For onboarding and technical implementation, see the Integration FAQ.

Is New L1 EVM-compatible?

Yes, at the execution layer. Existing Solidity bytecode uses compatible EVM semantics, but integrations must account for differences in fees, transaction timing, and RPC support. See the migration checklist.

How is it different from BNB Smart Chain?

New L1 uses the same Parlia PoSA and BLS fast-finality consensus family, with a faster block interval, decoupled ordering and execution, and features including native account abstraction, transaction pre-confirmation, Multi-Lane, and an optional shielded pool.

It complements BSC, which remains the broad-base network. There is no general requirement for existing BSC applications to migrate. See Overview.

Is New L1 live on mainnet?

Not yet. New L1 currently runs as a multi-validator devnet that is unstable and subject to breaking changes. Public testnet and mainnet have not launched. The partner-facing planning targets dated 2 November 2026 are Q1 2027 for public testnet and H2 2027 for mainnet, subject to testing and release readiness; these are not committed launch dates.

Use Network Information for current network details and the Integration FAQ for onboarding.

What asset is used for gas and staking?

BNB is the native asset; there is no separate native economic token. The devnet bridge connects New L1 to BSC Testnet. Use testnet BNB (tBNB) only: the bridge contracts are unaudited and the devnet may be reset. Public testnet and mainnet have not launched. See Role of BNB and the Integration FAQ for bridge instructions.

Can users transact without holding BNB?

Native fee sponsorship lets another account pay the network fee. A sponsor may separately offer token repayment where supported, while network gas remains denominated in BNB. This does not make stablecoins a native gas asset. See Fee Sponsorship for supported transactions and conditions.

Is private order flow the same as private on-chain transactions?

No. Proposed TEE ordering protects transaction information before ordering. The optional shielded pool hides supported on-chain transaction information. Integrating one does not automatically provide the other, and ordinary public contract interactions remain public. Deposits, withdrawals, atomic calls, and direct-submission fees have disclosure limits described in Privacy.

Can I treat a pre-confirmed transaction as final?

No. A roughly 20 ms pre-confirmation is revocable and does not establish execution success. For irreversible actions, wait for a successful, execution-finalized result; see integration settlement checks.

Is the shielded pool safe to use with real funds today?

Not yet. The circuits are unaudited, and the deployment uses an imported trusted setup rather than a New L1 ceremony. Do not treat it as safe for real value. See Privacy.

Integration topics